Letter to the Editor
Daily Press
Victorville,Ca
Rebuttal to Robert Reed’s SVL amendment, August, 25,2011
Thank you Mr. Hoover and Mr. Sabo for your valued input but you intentionally misdirect the reader from your true motivations. The onus of the present CC&R.’s is on the association to gather a 55% renewal vote every 10 years. The Board of Directors would like an automatic renewal so that the onus is on the disenfranchised of SVL to gather a 55% vote. This vote would be practically impossible. The proposed change would mean that the Board of Directors would have a perpetual strangled hold on the affairs of the association. The impact of any descent among homeowners to the actions of the Board would therefore be minimized. That is why the proposed CC&R's amendment is so worded and why Mr. Reed has an excellent point.
G.Goslaw
Proxy for the SVL homeowner Marjorie Goslaw
Victorville, CA.
