Thursday, August 4, 2011

Marriage

Letter to the Editor
Daily Press
Victorville, Ca


Some of us also love and depend on the dictionary but occasionally we miss the full meaning of a word. Mr. Gray, you have done so in your opinion of August 1, entitled “Semantics and marriage”. For fear of beating a dead horse, the fourth definition of marriage offered in my dictionary (Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language) reads, “Any close or intimate union”. Even the definition of “marry” has a broad context, number three states, “to join closely or intimately, unite”.

Every dictionary is a document of past verbal usage and therefore is never fully up to speed with the immediate culture. Thankfully, in today’s culture homosexuality is less a dirty word to be hidden from the children (in most cases), it is more a word that describes the few in every culture, past and present.

The common but sexist usage from the past is in my dictionary but to it’s credit there is an allowance for a definition that includes gay marriage. Your dictionary must have been written by a Neanderthal.

G.Goslaw
Victorville, Ca

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Sin has many flavors

Letter to the Editor
Daily Press
Victorville, CA.

Re: “Call it something else”, Michael F. Burt

The legal status quo in our country says that marriage is first and at least a civil legal matter. If the participants want that civil marriage to also be a religious exercise, say in a church, that is their right. The problem arises when our civil laws qualify the participants by requiring two persons of differing genders. If marriage is an American civil legal right, then the laws, to be American, should not be written to enforce any religious or supposed moral qualification for the participants. Civil marriage should be available to all Americans regardless of gender or intended life style. That legal standing should be an American civil right.

The Church can qualify the participants any way it so chooses because it is an available option. The point being is that if the laws were fairly written, there would be no problem. New York has just accomplished such a fair update to there marriage statutes and other states should follow suit. That we as a country are so slow to wake up to this reality can only be explained by American bigotry against gays. Bigotry condoned and supported by the Church and church folk like yourself. Bigotry akin to the racism against the black man that has so defined our culture and is also condoned and supported by the church. Mr. Burt, you claim not speak for God but then you do speak for God, we are confused.

Sin has many flavors.

G.Goslaw
Victorville, CA.

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Pinehurst and Colonial Court

Letter to the Editor
Daily Press
Victorville, Ca 95392

We are a community of families with shared values and space. We are neighbors of mixed racial, social and economic backgrounds who have chosen and learned to respect one another enough to be neighbors. We are not necessarily tight friends but we are neighbors. Neighborly drama is minimal but there are those moments. When drama happens, it seems to always be renters. That is not to say that all renters are drama queens, they are not for most are functioning and respected members of the community. However, when trouble comes it is always renters.

Such a drama event occurred Sunday night, June 26, 2011. The renters on the corner had a party mostly on the driveway with loud music and party noise. One neighbor had the courage to visit the party twice asking on each occasion that the noise be reduced. One visit was at 9:30 to be followed by a call to the Association Security Department for their help. Another visit by this neighbor occurred at 10:30. None of these actions quieted the party so the Sheriff was called twice, at 10:30 and 11:30. They finally responded after 12:30 when the party had quieted down on it’s own momentum. These renter’s disregarded repeated civil requests from their neighbor for them to be neighborly.

Apparently this was not the conclusion of the drama for these folk had in mind payback. On Monday noise was heard from the right front wheel of the party visitor’s pickup. Incorrectly assuming it was disc brake noise, plans were made for a trip to the beach with the grandchildren on Tuesday morning. The noise became excessive in Ventura and the hub cap was pulled to find all lug nuts very loose, one bouncing in the hub cap and one bolt stud broken. The repair station refused to put the aluminum wheel back on the vehicle because the stud holes were badly elongated trashing the wheel. The money is not the worst of the intended payback, the motive of the party goers was to put other neighbors lives and safety in danger. In this the party payback succeeded.

The party hosts, Yvonne and Manuel, are a part of a subculture that routinely uses intimidation to relate to their neighbors. Intimidation by direct confrontation, talking eye to eye, even shouting over a perceived injustice is the American way. Backstabbing is the way of the streets and surely is not neighborly but we neighbors are who we are. Of course the denial of responsibility and claims of innocence from the party folk accompany the intimidation. “You have no proof and the fault is with you and your poor vehicle maintenance”, so they say. The first part is correct, there is no actual proof but is there any reasonable doubt? These attempts at deflecting responsibility are to be expected from the corner of Pinehurst and Colonial Court. The greater villains are the owners of said property.

Dave and Georgia Herbst once lived in this house but are now landlords. Yvonne, the present tenant,works for Georgia in her business. These landlords, like the many landlords of Spring Valley Lake, refuse to take responsibility for the actions of their tenants and play the like mannered blame game,insisting that the troublemakers are not really troublemakers. Money is always the real issue. If Dave had visited that party, he would know the truth and could no longer hide in the bushes of another neighborhood. We live in this neighborhood.

G.Goslaw
Victorville, Ca

Friday, June 24, 2011

Healthcare expectations

June 24, 2011

G.Goslaw
7983 SVL Box
Victorville, Ca. 92395

James Krider, MD
Formula Medical Group
18182 HWY 18, Suite 105
Apple Valley, CA 92307

Dear James Krider,

Thank you for your registered letter of June 20, 2011. Dr. Krider, you are absolutely correct, we do have a difference of expectations. You expect your patients, at least this patient, to remind your referral person to generate the needed correspondence to gain an appointment with a specialist physician. Really, are your patients an extension of your office staff?

You are also correct, I raised my voice in protest at loosing a specialist appointment one hour before it was scheduled, an appointment that had already had a thirty day wait. It was cancelled because of Linda’s incompetence with the paperwork,repeated again and again over the last five months,probably at your direction.

Your leadership makes our doctor patient relationship impossible so I shall move on. However, the fault is yours. In the past few months, this patient has learned that life is so short and one never knows what awaits around the corner. Accordingly, another truism states that “what goes around always comes around”, at least life has provided me with ample educational experience to validate this additional fact.

We all are learning, you have my kindest regards into the future.

Your former patient,
G.Goslaw
Victorville, Ca.

Sunday, June 19, 2011

The Truth

Letter to the Editor
Daily Press
Victorville, Ca. 92392

Most Christian churchmen are Biblically ignorant and ignorantly bigoted. In truth the church social order is the priority of these folk. They choose to emulate the perceived social order as if it were God. They look to the Bible to validate this social order and fail to consider individual verses in their greater context,
including the character of the God they purport to worship. The thinkers of the church parrot this ignorance and/or are to cowardly to confront the ignorance for career and monetary concerns. It is a Donald Trump cop out, since he and they both love the truth but worship more the goodies of this world.

G.Goslaw
Victorville, Ca.

Saturday, June 11, 2011

The Few

Pensees’ # 179 There are few true Christians, I mean even as regards faith. There are plenty who believe, but out of superstition. There are plenty who do not believe, but because they are libertines, there are few in between. I do not include those who lead a really devout life, nor all those who believe by intuition of the heart.
Blaise Pascal, Pensees’, Penguin Books, 1995, p. 55.

Soren Kierkegaard (1850) must have read Blaise Pascal (1650), for they appear to be kindred spirits. They are both thinkers of the first order. What they are not is clergymen who owed their worldly existence to the church. Isn’t it strange how it seems to work that way? Thankfully, there have been men such as these in church history but sadly they have been the few.

As Pascal notes, Christian superstition has been and is a large segment of the faithful. In Kierkegaard’s time the superstitious believers were the Christian majority that just went along with the expected Lutheran faith of their fathers and the state run church. Though Pascal was always loyal to his Roman Catholic Church, he surely had in mind the superstitious rule of the church during the middle ages to include his time. Who are the superstitious believer's of our time? Who are the true Christians of our time? Any creditable clergyman will tell you that his office does not make him or her devout. It is the faithful, plain, quiet, devout widow lady in the second pew, right front. These folk have to live a religion of the heart. gg

Matthew 7:13&14 "Enter by the narrow gate; for the gate is wide, and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and many are those who enter by it. For the gate is small, and the way is narrow that leads to life, and few are those who find it.

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Terror

Pensees# 172 The way of God, who disposes all things with gentleness, is to instil religion into our minds with reasoned arguments and into our hearts with grace, but attempting to instil it into hearts and minds with force and threats is to instil not religion but terror.
Blaise Pascal, Pensees’, Penguin Books, 1995, p. 54.

Pascal the prophet is speaking. He comments on the church of his time (1650) and by extension to the church of our time. Could not the revivalist methodologies of the last two hundred years be an appropriate example? Threats of hell and eternal damnation have been and are used to manipulate seekers after truth. Terror is the supposed power of the pulpit. These tactics have accomplished some good but are they God's way? The church and it's pulpits fail to consider the damage done to the thinking but unbelieving adults to whom Pascal spoke. Let us define evangelism as did Pascal, as reasoned arguments and grace from God. gg